South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, a Republican, signed an executive order Tuesday restricting medication for abortion after she directed her “advocate for the unborn child” to find ways to “immediately review” the abortion. Texas’ new near-total abortion ban and “make sure we have the strongest pro-life laws in the books” after conservatives encouraged by the Supreme Court’s refusal to block the law began a new push to crack down on access to abortion.
Noem’s top legal adviser, Mark Miller, deployed to find areas where state abortion laws could be “tightened to mimic or go beyond” the Texas ban, according to Argus-Leader. On Tuesday, the governor took her first step in tightening state laws, restricting telemedicine abortions and abortion medications. The executive order prohibits medication for abortion “from being provided by courier, delivery, telemedicine or mail service” and on state land or in schools. It also requires that abortion medication be prescribed or provided only after a face-to-face examination by a state-licensed physician.
Texas lawmakers passed similar legislation independent of a ban on so-called “heartbeats” to restrict access to abortion drugs earlier this month, now awaiting the signing of Gov. Greg Abbott . Noem, in his order, asked the state legislature to codify the restrictions in law the next term.
Do you want to make a daily summary of all the news and comments that Salon offers? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.
The Food and Drug Administration previously required that the abortion drug Mifepristone be dispensed by a certified medical provider, but earlier this year suspended the application of the face-to-face requirement to reduce the risk of Covid spread. in the midst of the pandemic.
“The Biden Administration continues to override its authority and abolish legislatures that advocate for unborn children to pass strong pro-life laws. They are now working to make life easier for a child to be born through telemedicine abortion. This will not happen. in South Dakota, “Noem argued in a statement. “I will continue to work with the legislature and my newborn advocate (Mark Miller) to ensure that South Dakota remains a strong pro-life state.”
Proponents of reproductive health called Noah’s order an attack on reproductive freedom.
“We know that most South Dakotans support the right to legal and safe abortion, but Noem continues to have a vocal minority that is attacking abortion, contraception and comprehensive sex education in this country,” Kristin Hayward said. of the Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota Action Fund told Argus Leader.
South Dakota now has only one statewide clinic that performs regular abortions, and 39 percent of abortions last year were done with medication, according to the Associated Press. Proponents of reproductive health warned that the order would disproportionately affect rural residents living far from an abortion provider.
“Having an abortion is a private medical decision, which is protected by the U.S. Constitution, and it is disappointing that Governor Noem continues to fit into the patient-physician relationship,” said Janna Farley, a spokeswoman for the American Freedom Union. South Dakota civilians told the dam. “It is clear that attacks on our abortion rights are not being left to South Dakota.”
Noem is one of the growing Republican state officials who has taken advantage of the Supreme Court’s abdication in the Texas case to push for a similar ban. Texas law prohibits all abortions without exemptions for rape or incest survivors before most women know they are pregnant. Unlike other bans that have been overturned by the courts, Texas law would be enforced through a vigilant style system that allows almost anyone to sue any abortion provider or anyone who helps a woman in abort yourself, including family members or taxi drivers, and earn at least $ 10,000 without penalty if the process fails.
The Supreme Court will also have to hear arguments over a Mississippi law banning almost all abortions this fall, which worries advocates that could cause the increasingly right-wing court to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Two-thirds of Americans support Roe’s decision, according to a recent Quinnipiac poll. Amid rising draconian restrictions on abortion in the United States, other countries in the Americas have gone in the opposite direction. Argentina legalized abortion last year and the Supreme Court of Mexico ruled on Tuesday that criminalizing abortion in the country was unconstitutional, which advocates believe will affect all of Latin America. Meanwhile, Canada has allowed abortion at any stage of pregnancy for decades.
The Supreme Court refused to immediately block Texas law on procedural grounds, meaning the law will still be reviewed by the courts in the future. But Texas abortion clinics have already been forced to sideline women, advocating that the fear not reduce the number of abortions, but force underprivileged women to seek an out-of-state abortion. to resort to risky procedures.
Attorney General Merrick Garland on Monday vowed to “protect” women seeking abortion in Texas through a 1994 law that guarantees access to abortion clinics, though that law is limited to threats and physical obstructions that can prevent that women have access to a facility.
“We will not tolerate violence against those seeking to obtain or provide reproductive health services,” Garland said. “The department will support federal law enforcement when an abortion clinic or reproductive health center is attacked.”
President Joe Biden called Texas law “non-American” and promised a “government-wide effort” to respond to the ban.
“Texas law will significantly affect women’s access to the health care they need, particularly for communities of color and low-income people,” Biden said in a statement, adding that “this Texas’ extreme law blatantly violates constitutional law established under Roe v. Wade and confirmed as a precedent for nearly half a century. “